2nd REFLECTION DISCUSSION – NORTHERN RENAISSANCE, BAROQUE and AFTER
READ THE PARAMETERS FIRST BEFORE YOU POST A DISCUSSION. Invariably, a few students gloss the parameters and get very upset when the essay is rejected for failure to meet project requirements.
Need help? Or just want to discuss the posting? Write to my inbox! That’s what I’m here for!
Strict, 800 WORD LIMIT on the initial post.
OK kids, what do you think? That’s what I’ll be asking you every few weeks or so. Your job for this discussion, and for all the rest, is pretty open-ended, within the stated parameters. I’ll be doing this same assignment right along with you, since I never quit being a student of Art History. Please treat my postings as you would any other.
1. Select an image that represents the 2nd quarter of ART141, northern renaissance, Baroque, Dutch painting or 18th century discussed in modules 5 thru 8. Choose from the modules. You may also discuss a related Image that is not in the modules, but ask the professor first. Avoid the big, famous post-card stuff because it’s low-hanging fruit and previous students have done it to death. Show me that you’ve done a deeper dive into the material. Always select an image that is relevant to the discussion time frame. If you are unsure of your selection, just ask me. That’s what I’m here for. If you select an image not relevant to this discussion it will be deleted for being OFF-TOPIC. Off-TOPIC posts confuse the discussion.
2. Do some research about the image and the artist and know something about them. Statements like ” I don’t know what that guy with the beard is holding but it looks like a stick maybe” just make one look foolish. Do some homework and find out who the guy is, what he’s doing and so on.
3. Write a PERSONAL REFLECTION about what the image is and about what it means to YOU and how it informs YOUR your life or YOUR experience. This is the most critical item. DO NOT just write a high school book report about the image or the artist, informed by a few dull, Generic facts cribbed out of wikipedia or worse, padded with AI generated rhetoric. That’s a rip off, and it’s not what this assignment is about. I’m not going to give any student much for that sort of thing, so please be aware.
Write with your own voice. Don’t try to sound like an Art critic or a travelogue reporter, god forbid. Proof read for sense and spelling by all means but never undermine your own voice.
Traditional testing tells me which facts about the course content you have have acquired, but discussions tell me how you’re applying that knowledge. Both are vital, and weigh equally in your grade assessment.
4. Post the image you selected along with your personal reflection essay of 500 words. ALWAYS post in the discussion window. Linked items will not be graded.
Cornelisz – Massacre of the Innocents, 1590

Bruegel, Mad Meg – 1562

Bruegel, The Peasant Dance, 1563
![]()
Bruegel, The Triumph of Death – 1552
![]()
Peter Paul Rubins – Massacre of the Innocents, 1629 (High Baroque)
![]()
Film Noir – Asphalt Jungle, 1951

Caravaggio – The Entombment of Christ, 1603
![]()
Boulogne – Jesus and the Woman Taken in Adultery, c.1620 ![]()
Rubens, The Education of Maria De Medici -1625 Rubens, The Arrival of Maria De Medici – 1625
![]()

Rubens, The Arrival of Maria De Medici – 1625 
Rubins – the Crucifixion Triptych, 1629

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.