This final project should assess my ability to design and articulate a methodologically sound research study in public/nonprofit administration. The work should demonstrate mastery of core research design principles, including conceptualization, theory building, hypothesis development, measurement, sampling, and analytic strategy.

Empirical Research Paper

Conduct an original, smallscale empirical analysis using publicly available data (e.g., U.S. Census data, election returns, administrative datasets, legislative behavior data). Your analysis must be methodologically appropriate, clearly linked to your research question, and grounded in relevant theory.

Required Components

1.Introduction

• Clear, concise statement of the research question.
• Explanation of the questions scholarly and practical significance within public/nonprofit administration.
• Brief overview of the puzzle, problem, or gap motivating the study.

2.Literature Review

• Synthesisnot a listof the most relevant scholarly debates, theories, and empirical findings.
• Identification of conceptual, theoretical, or empirical gaps your project addresses.
• Clear articulation of how your study contributes to or extends existing research.

3.Theory and Hypotheses

• Explanation of the theoretical logic underlying your research question.
• Development of a coherent conceptual framework that links independent and dependent variables.
• Statement of testable hypotheses (for quantitative work) or guiding propositions/expectations (for qualitative or mixedmethods work).
• Discussion of alternative explanations where appropriate.

4.Research Design

• Justification of your methodological approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed).
• Operational definitions of all key concepts and variables, including measurement strategies and potential limitations.
• Sampling strategy and case selection rationale (e.g., population, sampling frame, selection criteria).
• Discussion of validity and reliability concerns relevant to your design.

5.Data and Analysis

• Description of the dataset, variables, and analytic procedures used.
• Presentation of results using appropriate tables, figures, or qualitative evidence.
• Interpretation of findings in relation to your hypotheses and theoretical expectations.

6.Conclusion

• Summary of key findings (empirical papers) or expected contributions (proposals).
• Discussion of limitations, threats to inference, and methodological or theoretical constraints.
• Suggestions for future research, policy implications, or avenues for further inquiry.

7.References

• Minimum of 15 scholarly sources (peerreviewed journal articles, academic books, or highquality research reports). At least 70% must be from public/nonprofit administration-focused sources.
• Proper citation in APA style.

Evaluation Criteria

The project will be assessed to the extent to which it demonstrates:

• Conceptual clarity and precision in defining the research question.
• Depth and synthesis in the literature review.
• Strength and coherence of the theoretical framework.
• Appropriateness and rigor of the research design.
• Quality and accuracy of empirical analysis (if applicable).
• Clear, persuasive academic writing and organization.
• Proper citation and engagement with scholarly sources.